Niche construction in ecology

What is a niche?

A key feature of modern niche concepts is that the ecological niche is defined relative to the organism at its centre. This is because organisms determine which environmental factors are significant components of their world, a perspective very much in line with niche construction theory.

Organisms actively modify their niches, and those of other organisms, through their activities and choices. However, niches have typically been construed as static rather than evolving. In order to devise a more dynamic niche concept, Odling-Smee et al. (2003) characterize an evolutionary niche as ‘the sum of all the natural selection pressures to which the population is exposed’, an approach well-received by ecologists (Chase & Leibold 2003). The evolutionary niche can be viewed as a dynamic (i.e. evolving) version of the more familiar ecological niche when the latter is characterized as an n-dimensional hypervolume of those conditions and resources relevant to the population (Hutchinson 1957).

How do organisms modify niches?

Organisms change their niches, by physically changing environments, or by relocating in space, thereby exposing themselves to new conditions. They may create novel niches by inceptive niche construction, by innovating. For example, the evolution of improved paper technology in Polistinae wasps apparently had massive effects on the geographic distribution, colony size and social complexity of these wasps (Hansell 1993).

Nest building has shaped the evolution and distribution of wasps.

Organisms can also buffer out some of the changes in their environments that are caused by other agents by counteractive niche construction. For instance, wasps regulate temperature in their nests by bringing droplets of water to cool the nest, or by stretching and contracting their abdomens in unison to warm the nest.

Through niche construction, organisms can influence and control some flows of energy and materials among trophically interconnected organisms, even without being part of those flows themselves. The modification of natural selection by niche construction may be direct, as occurs when animals construct artifacts, such as nests or dams. Conversely, organisms may only modify natural selection indirectly, or gradually, for instance through the slow accumulation in their environments of the by-products of their metabolisms, and detritus producing activities – which generates an ecological inheritance.

How does niche construction relate to ecosystem engineering?

Niche construction theory explores two interacting processes. The first is the modification of niches by the environment-altering and -selecting activities of organisms. The second is the subsequent evolution of one or more populations in response to selection altered by the first process. The environment-altering aspect of niche construction is broadly similar to the concept of ecosystem engineering in ecology (Jones et al. 1994, 1997).

By building dams, beavers modify river ecology for decades, dramatically changing the environments of numerous organisms.

Jones et al. drew attention to the comparative lack of ecological research dedicated to studying organisms that modulate the availability of resources and habitats in ecosystems. For instance, beavers’ dams have dramatic effects on the flows of energy and matter through river environments. Kelp are another example: their growth creates forests that provide habitat for countless other organisms.

Kelp forests create homes for countless marine creatures.

Many species do influence energy flows, mass flows, and trophic patterns in ecosystems, by generating ‘engineering’ control webs based on mosaics of connectivity among species . Jones et al. have shown that engineering webs make significant contributions to the regulation of energy and matter flows in ecosystems, alongside webs of trophic interactions.

How are ecologists using niche construction theory?

Recent years have witnessed considerable efforts to operationalize the niche construction concept within ecology, and devise means for its investigation. These methods provide tools to explore how niche construction triggers ecological and evolutionary feedbacks, to detect the ecological signatures that it leaves, and to explore its effects on biodiversity.

Post  & Palkovacs (2009) illustrate how niche construction can generate eco-evolutionary feedbacks, and how these can be investigated.

Table 1 from Post and Palkovacs 2009

Odling-Smee et al. (2013) describe some of the ecological and evolutionary impacts on ecosystems of niche construction.

Matthews et al. (2014) propose an operational framework to evaluate comparative and experimental evidence of the evolutionary consequences of niche construction, and suggest how such research can improve our understanding of ecological and evolutionary dynamics in ecosystems .

Brathen & Raivolainen (2015) show that species sharing a single trait or species belonging to a growth form can act as collective niche constructors, and be important predictors of species diversity in ecological communities. In tundra plant communities, forbs and grasses were the least abundant growth forms, yet they were the strongest positive predictors of species diversity.

Ware et al. (2019) propose a conceptual model that shows how feedbacks across levels of organization link theory associated with eco-evolutionary dynamics, niche construction and the geographic mosaic theory of evolution.

Fig 1 from Ware et al. 2019

Coexistence, range expansion and adaptive radiation

Theoretical studies show that niche construction has important effects on species coexistence, range expansion and adaptive radiation.

Kylafis & Loreau (2011) introduce the concept of ‘ecological niche construction’, the process whereby an organism improves its environment to enhance its growth and persistence, which they argue is an important missing element of niche theory. In a model of two consumers that compete for one limiting resource and one predator, they show how niche construction modifies the traditional niche-deteriorating impacts of its agent or of competing species, and hence the potential for species coexistence. Thus niche construction can promote mutualism and niche partitioning, although under different conditions it can strengthen interspecific competition. The authors also show how niche construction strongly affects the realized niche of a species.

Kylafis & Loreau (2008) demonstrate that niche construction can generate local spatial effects that can allow a population to promote its own range expansion. In this manner, niche construction potentially plays a role in adaptive radiation. Such effects can link eco-evolutionary feedbacks to the process of adaptive radiation. Rather than lineages simply diversifying to “fill” available niches, niches themselves may be diversifying (Erwin 2005), a process subsequently termed “self-propagating adaptive radiation.”

Krakauer, Page, & Erwin (2009) show that niche construction can drive coevolutionary events, exacerbate and ameliorate competition, affect the likelihood of coexistence and produce macroevolutionary trends.

Key readings

Buser CC, Newcomb RD, Gaskett, AC & Goddard MR. 2014. Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions. Ecology letters. 17(10): 1257-1264. Demonstrates experimentally how through niche construction (modification of fruit) the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae attracts Drosophila, facilitating its propagation.

Erwin DH . 2005. Seeds of diversity. Science. 308:1752–1753. Presents the hypothesis that organisms construct new niches, leading to diversification.

Hamblin SR, White PA, Tanaka MM. 2014. Viral niche construction alters hosts and ecosystems at multiple scales. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 29(11): 594-9. Viruses modify host environments, and these modifications drive evolutionary feedback between the virus and its environment across multiple scales from cells to ecosystems.

Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 69: 373-386. The most authoritative introduction to the concept of ecosystem engineering.

Krakauer DC, Page KM, Erwin DH. 2009. Diversity, dilemmas, and monopolies of niche construction. American Naturalist. 173: 26–40. Demonstrates a fundamental dilemma of niche construction, whereby the construction of a shared resource leads to a tragedy of the commons, with competition tending to eliminate niche construction strategies.

Kylafis G, Loreau M. 2008 Ecological and evolutionary consequences of niche construction for its agent. Ecology Letters. 11: 1072-1081. This theoretical analysis shows that this niche construction allows the persistence of the plants under infertile soil conditions that would otherwise lead to their extinction.

Kylafis G, Loreau M. 2011 Niche construction in the light of niche theory. Ecology Letters. 14: 82–90. Introduces the concept of ‘ecological niche construction’, the process whereby an organism improves its environment to enhance its growth and persistence.

Matthews B, De Meester L, Jones CG, Iberlings BW, Bouma TJ, Nuutinen V, van der Koppel J & Odling-Smee J. 2014. Under niche construction: an operational bridge between ecology, evolution and ecosystem science. Ecological Monographs. 84.2: 245–263. Written for professional ecologists with a view to operationalizing niche construction, this article illustrates how niche construction can be investigated.

Mumby, PJ,  van Woesik R. 2014. Consequence of ecological, evolutionary and biogeochemical uncertainty for coral reef responses to climatic stress. Current Biology. 24: R413–R423. Describes how niche construction and ecological inheritance by corals impacts on how they respond to human-generated changes in conditions, including climate change.

Odling-Smee J 2024. Niche Construction. How Life Contributes to its own Evolution. MIT Press. Odling-Smee’s new book summarises the latest in niche construction theory in a readable form.

Odling-Smee FJ, Erwin D, Palkovacs E, Feldman M, Laland KN. 2013 Niche construction theory: a practical guide for ecologists. Quarterly Review Biology. 88, 3-28. This article provides a practical guide to how niche construction theory can be deployed by ecologists and evolutionary biologists to explore eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Post DM, Palkovacs EP. 2009. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.  364: 1629–1640. Illustrates how niche construction contributes to eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Sultan SE. 2015. Organism & environment: Ecological development, niche construction, and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The most up-to-date and authoritative and comprehensive treatment of niche construction, packed with empirical examples, particularly in plants and animals.

Related articles

Niche construction in ecology

Niche construction in the human sciences

Niche construction in developmental biology

Niche construction in medicine

Niche construction and conservation biology